https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/commit/?id=0e3dae78b3

From 0e3dae78b31fbb86233aac80668a06d9930ca47f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sonots <sonots@g...>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:38:32 +0900
Subject: template/Doxyfile.tmpl: EXTRACT_STATIC: YES [Bugs #14037]

I often feel that C API documents are lacked in C source codes,
especially for static functions. I propose to turn EXTRACT_STATIC = YES
flag of Doxygen to YES, and write document comments for static functions
as much as possible.

* template/Doxyfile.tmpl: EXTRACT_STATIC: YES [Bugs #14037]
---
 template/Doxyfile.tmpl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/template/Doxyfile.tmpl b/template/Doxyfile.tmpl
index 3860bab..529e7f2 100644
--- a/template/Doxyfile.tmpl
+++ b/template/Doxyfile.tmpl
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ EXTRACT_PACKAGE        = NO https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/template/Doxyfile.tmpl#L520
 # included in the documentation.
 # The default value is: NO.
 
-EXTRACT_STATIC         = NO
+EXTRACT_STATIC         = YES
 
 # If the EXTRACT_LOCAL_CLASSES tag is set to YES, classes (and structs) defined
 # locally in source files will be included in the documentation. If set to NO,
-- 
cgit v1.1


--
ML: ruby-changes@q...
Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/