https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/commit/?id=39f99b8176

From 39f99b8176ddec14058919ae8a317ea0c5216812 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yusuke Endoh <mame@r...>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:54:02 +0900
Subject: Use assert_not_match "Did you mean?" for UncorrectableNameCheckTest

... instead of exact matching. I'm now creating a built-in gem that
modifies Exception's error message, so the expectation value is changed.

IMO, it is good to check that did_you_mean suggestion is NOT added in
the uncorrectable case.

https://github.com/ruby/did_you_mean/commit/ebe88ec4d2
---
 test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb b/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
index 5d934e5..2fa65bb 100644
--- a/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
+++ b/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ class UncorrectableNameCheckTest < Test::Unit::TestCase https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/test/did_you_mean/spell_checking/test_uncorrectable_name_check.rb#L10
   end
 
   def test_message
-    assert_equal "Other name error", @error.message
+    assert_not_match /Did you mean\?/, @error.message
   end
 end
-- 
cgit v1.1


--
ML: ruby-changes@q...
Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/