ruby-changes:63193
From: =E5=8D=9C=E9=83=A8=E6=98=8C=E5=B9=B3 <ko1@a...>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:59:17 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [ruby-changes:63193] 06099e4ee1 (master): fix typo [ci skip]
https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/commit/?id=06099e4ee1 From 06099e4ee1c7ebe0a67929e42b6498612e4a25c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=8D=9C=E9=83=A8=E6=98=8C=E5=B9=B3?= <shyouhei@r...> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:57:47 +0900 Subject: fix typo [ci skip] Reported by Mau Magnaguagno See: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3570#discussion_r495465903 diff --git a/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h b/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h index ff90f2f..b9a24d3 100644 --- a/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h +++ b/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct rbimpl_alignof { https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h#L116 # * querying the alignment of a type, you definitely should use that instead. # * There are 2 known pitfalls for this fallback implementation: # * -# * Fitst, it is either an undefined behaviour (C) or an explicit error (C++) +# * First, it is either an undefined behaviour (C) or an explicit error (C++) # * to define a struct inside of `offsetof`. C compilers tend to accept such # * things, but AFAIK C++ has no room to allow. # * -- cgit v0.10.2 -- ML: ruby-changes@q... Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/