[前][次][番号順一覧][スレッド一覧]

ruby-changes:63193

From: =E5=8D=9C=E9=83=A8=E6=98=8C=E5=B9=B3 <ko1@a...>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:59:17 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [ruby-changes:63193] 06099e4ee1 (master): fix typo [ci skip]

https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/commit/?id=06099e4ee1

From 06099e4ee1c7ebe0a67929e42b6498612e4a25c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=8D=9C=E9=83=A8=E6=98=8C=E5=B9=B3?=
 <shyouhei@r...>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:57:47 +0900
Subject: fix typo [ci skip]

Reported by Mau Magnaguagno See: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3570#discussion_r495465903

diff --git a/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h b/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h
index ff90f2f..b9a24d3 100644
--- a/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h
+++ b/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct rbimpl_alignof { https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/include/ruby/internal/stdalign.h#L116
 #  * querying the alignment of a type,  you definitely should use that instead.
 #  * There are 2 known pitfalls for this fallback implementation:
 #  *
-#  * Fitst, it is either an undefined  behaviour (C) or an explicit error (C++)
+#  * First, it is either an undefined  behaviour (C) or an explicit error (C++)
 #  * to define a  struct inside of `offsetof`. C compilers  tend to accept such
 #  * things, but AFAIK C++ has no room to allow.
 #  *
-- 
cgit v0.10.2


--
ML: ruby-changes@q...
Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/

[前][次][番号順一覧][スレッド一覧]