ruby-changes:53446
From: nobu <ko1@a...>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:46:40 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [ruby-changes:53446] nobu:r65662 (trunk): Use friendlier terminology in rubysocket.h comment
nobu 2018-11-11 09:46:31 +0900 (Sun, 11 Nov 2018) New Revision: 65662 https://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=65662 Log: Use friendlier terminology in rubysocket.h comment [Fix GH-2008] From: Juanito Fatas <juanito.fatas@s...> Modified files: trunk/ext/socket/rubysocket.h Index: ext/socket/rubysocket.h =================================================================== --- ext/socket/rubysocket.h (revision 65661) +++ ext/socket/rubysocket.h (revision 65662) @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ NORETURN(void rsock_sys_fail_raddrinfo_o https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/ext/socket/rubysocket.h#L408 * all cases. For some syscalls (e.g. accept/accept4), blocking on the * syscall instead of relying on select/poll allows the kernel to use * "wake-one" behavior and avoid the thundering herd problem. - * This is likely safe on all other *nix-like systems, so this whitelist + * This is likely safe on all other *nix-like systems, so this safe list * can be expanded by interested parties. */ #if defined(__linux__) -- ML: ruby-changes@q... Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/