ruby-changes:40100
From: kosaki <ko1@a...>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:43:13 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [ruby-changes:40100] kosaki:r52181 (trunk): * random.c (fill_random_bytes_urandom): add a comment why using
kosaki 2015-10-18 14:43:08 +0900 (Sun, 18 Oct 2015) New Revision: 52181 http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=52181 Log: * random.c (fill_random_bytes_urandom): add a comment why using O_NONBLOCK and O_NOCTTY. Modified files: trunk/ChangeLog trunk/random.c Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== --- ChangeLog (revision 52180) +++ ChangeLog (revision 52181) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/ChangeLog#L1 +Sun Oct 18 14:37:56 2015 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@g...> + + * random.c (fill_random_bytes_urandom): add a comment why using + O_NONBLOCK and O_NOCTTY. + Sun Oct 18 13:30:56 2015 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@g...> * random.c (fill_random_bytes_syscall): don't use GRND_NONBLOCK. Index: random.c =================================================================== --- random.c (revision 52180) +++ random.c (revision 52181) @@ -455,6 +455,11 @@ random_init(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/random.c#L455 static int fill_random_bytes_urandom(void *seed, size_t size) { + /* + O_NONBLOCK and O_NOCTTY is meaningless if /dev/urandom correctly point + to urandom device. But it protect from several strange hazard if + /dev/urandom is not urandom device. + */ int fd = rb_cloexec_open("/dev/urandom", # ifdef O_NONBLOCK O_NONBLOCK| -- ML: ruby-changes@q... Info: http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/quickml/